what does it feel like to get spanked

© 2010 – 2019 Gwen Dewar, Ph.D., all rights reserved

Spanking children doesn't assist them acquire self-control or social skills, and studies consistently show that spanking increases a kid'southward risk of developing beliefs problems. Simply how tin we be sure that spanking is harmful, and what can parents do instead when their children misbehave?

---

"Spanking" refers to slapping a child beyond the buttocks, usually with a bare mitt. It'south a form of corporal penalisation, defined by researchers (Donnelly and Straus 2005) every bit

"the employ of physical forcefulness with the intention of causing a child to experience hurting, but not injury, for the purpose of correcting or controlling the child'due south beliefs."

Who wants to control a child by inflicting pain?

It'due south safe to assume that most parents don't enjoy spanking their children. If they spank, they practice information technology because they believe spanking is the most effective disciplinary tactic available. Or because they're in a stressful situation, fed up by misbehavior, and unable to think of a improve response.

But whatever the case, it'due south clear that corporal punishment is a cultural miracle, something that people are socialized to do.

Parents don't automatically spank their children. It depends on their perceptions of what's normal or expected (Chiocca 2017). And in most cultures, spanking isn't expected.

When anthropologists reviewed parenting practices in 186 different earth cultures, they found that corporal punishment was frequent or typical in but 40% of them. And amidst some groups – like hunter-gatherers – corporal punishment was rare, or birthday absent-minded (Ember and Ember 2005).

In many countries today, people are questioning their traditional acceptance of spanking, and making big changes.

Since 1979, 54 nations accept outlawed corporal punishment (Global Initiative to End Corporal Punishment of Children 2019). The American University of Pediatrics has recently issued recommendations that parents avoid all forms of physical punishment, including spanking (Sege et al 2018).

Still some parents however favor corporal penalisation, especially those who endorse opens in a new windowauthoritarian principles of child-rearing (Coley et al 2016; Friedson 2016; Gunroe 2013).

What does research reveal about the effects? Social scientists are still putting together all the pieces. Just there is agreement on many points.

• Infants should never be spanked.  There are no benefits — only harms and risks — including very serious ones. Read more about it opens in a new window here.

• Children who are spanked tend to go worse over time. Research suggests that spanking increases a child's take chances of becoming more antisocial and distressed. Kids are besides more than likely to develop negative relationships with their parents.

• Equally a disciplinary tactic, spanking is less effective than positive parenting. Studies indicate that kids go more cooperative and cocky-controlled compliant when parents use positive parenting techniques  and show-based approaches to opens in a new window behavior problems.

• The negative effects of spanking increase with the severity, frequency, and emotional context of the spankings.  Children tend to develop more beliefs problems when they are spanked regularly, spanked in anger, or spanked with objects.

Are there complicating factors?

Yes. Some parents resort to spanking because their kids are especially aggressive or defiant, which ways the causation is bidirectional: Child assailment can trigger spanking, and spanking can brand kids more aggressive (Barnes et al 2013).

This doesn't mean spanking is a skilful way to handle defiance. But it does arrive hard to tell how much of a child'due south behavior problems arecaused by spanking.

It's besides axiomatic that the effects of spanking are chastened past culture. Kids experience greater harm in societies where corporal penalisation is less commonplace.

Here is a look at the details.

---

The effects of spanking children

How can we know if spanking is harmful?

Corporal penalty has been linked with all sorts of behavior issues, including assailment, paranoia, school failure, poor emotional regulation, and depression empathy (Larzelere and Kuhn 2005; Johnson et al 2006; Alyahri and Goodman 2008; Chang et al 2003; Gershoff 2002).

How do we explicate these links? One possibility is that corporal punishment contributes to the development of problems. In other words, mayhap spanking makes children's behavior worsen over time.

Information technology'southward a worrying thought. But how can nosotros prove it? We need to do two things.

1. Nosotros need to distinguish spanking from other forms of corporal punishment.

Many studies lump together spanking and harsher forms of discipline, like hitting children with objects. As a consequence, it's not articulate how much trouble is associated with spanking, as opposed to more extreme punishments and abuse.

2. Nosotros need to rule out alternative explanations for the link between spanking and behavior problems.

Some kids are more defiant, difficult, or slow to obey. We'd expect these kids to get spanked more frequently than kids who are well-behaved. If there is a link betwixt spanking and beliefs problems, we need to be certain information technology isn't driven by these pre-existing differences between kids.

Ordinarily, the best way to go answers is to run controlled, randomized experiments. But that would be unethical. So researchers have tried some other approach: the prospective study.

Prospective studies follow the same individuals over the long term. They measure out behavior at several points in fourth dimension, assuasive them to track how people change. This allows researchers to command for individual differences in kid aggression, intelligence, and other traits.

If, for example, a study shows that kids who are spanked are more than likely than other kids to become increasingly antisocial, nosotros've got evidence that spanking causes aggression.

And that'due south what the research shows.

Children who get spanked tend to develop more problems over time

Spanking children at a immature historic period leads to increased aggression, and may also set the phase for slower cognitive evolution.

A study of depression-income European-American, African-American, and Mexican-American toddlers institute that kids who were spanked at 12 months were more likely to take aggressive behavior problems at age three. They also scored lower on the Bayley examination of mental development (Berlin et al 2009).

Were parents merely responding to their children'due south shortcomings? Spanking children because they were more ambitious or slow? Possibly the kid's behavior acquired the spankings, instead of the other style around.

Merely if that were the instance, we'd wait to come across the bug precede spankings. And that's not what the researchers constitute. The team tested kids when they were two, and looked to see if ambitious behavior bug or low Bayley scores predicted spanking a twelvemonth later. They didn't.

Studies of preschoolers have reported similar results, even subsequently decision-making for mutual risk factors, like child neglect, corruption, or having a mother with mental health problems  (e.g., MacKenzie et al 2012; MacKenzie et al 2015).

And while some inquiry has failed to find a link between spanking and cognitive outcomes (Maguire-Jack et al 2012), the other part of the story — the link between spanking and beliefs problems — is on solid ground.

For example, when Jennifer Lansford and her colleagues tracked a grouping of children for more a decade, they found that kids were more likely to develop antisocial tendencies if they were spanked during early childhood.

Moreover, in that location was a dosage consequence: Kids who continued to receive spankings during the schoolhouse years tended to develop the most severe problems. They also had the least positive relationships with their parents (Lansford et al 2009).

Subsequent studies — conducted in Japan and the Us — take reported like results. When kids experience spankings at an earlier historic period, they are more likely to develop behavior problems after on (Coley et al 2014; MacKenzie et al 2013; MacKenzie et al 2015; Okuzono et al 2017; Taylor et al 2010).

And once over again, these links persist even after researchers control for other kid hazard factors, similar maternal mental health, child temperament, and socioeconomic condition (Coley et al 2014; MacKenzie et al 2013; MacKenzie et al 2015; Okuzono et al 2017; Taylor et al 2010).

But hang on — these prospective studies tin can't rule everything out. Maybe some kids are just very difficult to bargain with. Maybe their behavior problems would worsen no thing what their parents did.

Robert Larzelere and his colleagues accept wondered about this betoken. In item, they've voiced skepticism most the causal link betwixt spanking and hating beliefs (Larzelere et al 2010). Their reasoning goes like this:

Suppose that the observed link between spanking and hating behavior is driven by the kids themselves. Some kids are more unruly, so they provoke more than censure.

If true, nosotros should detect links betwixt antisocial behavior and disciplinary actions in general — non just concrete punishments.

Larzelere's squad tested this prediction by re-analyzing data from an older study that reported correlations betwixt spanking and antisocial behavior.

Their results? In add-on to a link between antisocial behavior and spanking, the researchers also found links betwixt

• hating beliefs and "grounding" (i.eastward., punishing kids by taking away their privileges), and
• antisocial behavior and psychotherapy.

And then Larzerle'south team found support for their idea. Private differences explain part of the correlation between anti-social behavior and spanking. Some parents accept to cope with more than difficult kids. We can't assume that spanking created their beliefs issues.

But this doesn't tell u.s. that spanking is the solution. The prove suggests otherwise.

---

Positive parenting techniques are more constructive in the long-term

When Robert Larzelere conducted a meta assay of 26 published studies on corporal punishment, he and his colleague Brett Kuhn concluded that even balmy physical punishment — if used as the primary method of bailiwick — was linked with poorer child outcomes (Larzelere and Kuhn 2005).

When it came to solving behavior bug, the most effective arroyo was combination ofreasoning and non-concrete penalty(Larzelere and Kuhn 2005).

That'due south consistent with a large body of inquiry on the evolution of cooperation, moral reasoning, and self-control.

What can children learn from beingness spanked? Not much. The experience of existence spanked doesn't show children how to better command their impulses. It doesn't provide them with whatever insights into peacefully negotiating conflicts with peers. Information technology doesn't help them wrestle with moral questions, or develop feelings of compassion and social responsibility.

In fact, it's not even clear that spanking children teaches them what they did incorrect.

opens in a new windowVery young children are probably also distressed and confused to understand the parent'due south point. Their protector has turned against them, provoking emotions that overwhelm their ability to attend to anything else. And even older children have trouble making sense of corporal punishment.

When researchers in New Zealand interviewed 80 kids between the ages of 5 and 14, most kids said they had experienced physical punishments, and approximately one-half the kids reported that they sometimes didn't empathise the disciplinary bulletin (Dobbs et al 2006).

So corporal punishment doesn't provide children with the tools they need to correct their ain behavior. For this, they need our thoughtful, effective help.

For instance, kids need us to talk with them near their feelings. What should y'all do when you experience really aroused? When we coach children on how to handle their ain emotions, we assistance them develop self-control.

Kids too do good when we talk with them about other people'due south feelings and perspectives. How does information technology brand your sis experience when you knock downwards her tower of blocks? What can yous exercise to make amends?

When nosotros help kids understand how their behavior affects others, we assist them develop an internal sense of correct and wrong, and provide them with crucial insights for getting along with other people.

Kids need a lot of other things too, peculiarly the kids who get into trouble the well-nigh, who often have opens in a new windowattention problems, poor working retention skills, or other difficulties. They need usa to act as good role models, and they demand an surroundings that feels safe, supportive, and fair. Instead of threats and condemnation, they demand friendly reminders (to stay on rail) and positive reinforcement (like a hearty "thank you!") when they are kind or helpful.

Parents provide this sort of help when they use positive parenting techniques, and other, non-combative approaches to shaping and correcting behavior.

For more than information, see my these evidence-based tips for opens in a new windowtreatment aggressive or disruptive behavior, as well as this guide to opens in a new windowpositive parenting techniques. In addition, encounter these articles most opens in a new windoweducational activity children virtually emotions, and supporting the evolution of opens in a new windowself-control.

What nearly the emotional context? Do the effects of spanking depend on whether a parent shows anger?

Research suggests that the answer is yes.

For case, the only course of spanking I've seen any researcher defend is "conditional spanking" — one or two light slaps to the buttocks, administered with a bare paw, without anger, and immediately after a child has misbehaved.

By definition, conditional spanking is used sparingly — only after non-concrete punishments have been attempted, and only afterwards the kid has failed to heed a warning.

Is this approach to spanking as detrimental equally other forms of spanking? Probably not. In function, that's because parents who utilize conditional spanking do so infrequently. Merely it seems likely that emotion besides plays a role.

Research suggests that the negative furnishings of spanking increase when parents show low levels of warmth and sensitivity (Berlin et al 2009). And in general, nosotros know that  children suffer when their parents are ofttimes angry, cold, hateful-spirited, or fell (O'Leary 1995).

As noted by Lei Chang and colleagues, "the expression of anger, coldness, or hatred that accompanies the physical act of parental aggression could well be more detrimental than the act of assailment itself" (Chang et al 2003).

And what near spanking in the schools?

That'south harmful too, and not but to the kids who get spanked. Inquiry reveals that schools treat students unequally, perpetuating a climate of racism, and contributing to racist attitudes.

At that place haven't been as many studies addressing corporal punishment in the schools, but the research that exists is consistent with what we know about parental spanking.

In countries throughout the globe, school corporal punishment is linked with worse emotional and bookish outcomes (Gershoff 2017; Ogando Portela 2015; Talwar et al 2011).

There is also evidence that acts of public shaming backfire. They tend to make individuals feel either hopeless, or angry and unrepentant. These aren't feelings that inspire kids to improve their behavior.

And so there is a very dissimilar trouble, which is that kids aren't subjected to equal handling. Studies reveal that corporal penalisation is meted out with bias.

For example, in U.S. states where corporal punishment in the schools is legal, Black students are more probable to receive physical penalisation than White students, and this disparity is unrelated to rates of misbehavior.

For a given offense, black children receive more severe punishments than white students do (Gershoff and Font 2016).

Similar unjustified disparities have been observed for students with disabilities, including autism (Gershoff and Font 2016).

So information technology's likely that corporal punishment harms more than the students who receive the blows. Information technology also creates a harmful temper — a climate that reinforces racist attitudes, and the stigmatization of people with disabilities.

Only can we presume that everyone is affected in the aforementioned way? Doesn't civilization make a difference?

International enquiry suggests that spanking is problematic in cultures throughout the world. I've yet to come across compelling testify that corporal punishment is always a practiced thing. But civilisation does announced to brand a difference. In some cultures, the negative effects of spanking are more marked.

To see why, imagine ii kids. Both get spankings, but they live in different settings.

• Buddy lives in a place where most kids get spanked.
• Fred lives in a customs where corporal punishment is uncommon.

We might expect Fred to have a tougher time. His parents' disciplinary tactics are out of pace with community norms. As a result, Fred may be more likely to view spanking as a sign that his parents are — distressingly — out of control. And then Fred experiences more than psychological harm.

We can see this playing out in Norway, where spanking has been illegal since 1987. Virtually ethnic Norwegians reject spanking every bit a disciplinary tactic, simply among the Sami, an indigenous minority group, people oft accept spanking as a traditional exercise.

Does information technology make a deviation? It seems to. Among ethnic Norwegians, physical penalisation predicts a blueprint of increasing anti-social behavior over time. Among the Sami, researchers have constitute no such correlation (Javo et al 2004).

Similar differences amidst ethnic groups might exist in the The states (eastward.1000.,Whaley 2000; Simons et al 2013), though some studies have failed to detect such differences (Gershoff et al 2012).

What's better documented are differences between nations:

In studies of corporal penalisation in 6 cultures (China, India, Italian republic, Kenya, Philippines, and Thailand) researchers found that physical discipline was ever linked with increased child aggression and anxiety. But the link was weaker in countries where corporal penalization was commonplace (Lansford et al 2005; Gershoff et al 2010).

Does this mean nosotros shouldn't exist concerned nearly culturally-accustomed spanking?

I don't think so.

Beginning, as I've already noted, the research doesn't indicate that spanking is sometimes a proficient thing. Rather, it suggests that spanking kids may exist less harmful in certain settings.

Second, we need to consider the larger cultural bulletin that spanking sends. Spanking may have the event of legitimizing aggression as a way to resolve conflicts.

In part, I'm thinking of research showing links betwixt the corporal punishment of children and interpersonal violence.

For example, in one study, kids subjected to spanking were more likely to endorse hitting as an adequate mode to resolve conflicts with siblings and peers (Simons and Wurtele 2010). Another report confirms that rates of peer violence among adolescents is higher in countries that let corporal punishment (Elgar et al 2018).

Simply I'm likewise thinking about big-scale correlations between corporal punishment and societal values.

Recall that massive, cantankerous-cultural analysis I mentioned at the beginning of this commodity? The one featuring 186 different world cultures?

When Carol and Melvin Ember dug into this data set, they establish that kids were more than often subjected to concrete punishment in societies with high levels of social stratification and low levels of democracy (Ember and Ember 2005).

And when Jennifer Lansford and Kenneth Dodge studied the sample sample, they discovered that corporal penalization was more common in societies that endorse violence and engage in frequent warfare (Lansford and Dodge 2008).

So perhaps physical penalty functions as a training tool, ane that prepares kids for living in a world where might makes right.

That doesn't mean that parents are trying to make children more than aggressive. On the opposite, they may be trying to teach their children to be more submissive — to conform to the harsh realities of an disciplinarian or vehement status quo.

But either way, these lessons contribute to the bicycle of violence, and they perpetuate systems that deny people their basic, human rights.

It'due south a sobering idea, and one worth reflecting on when people try to justify spanking every bit a "important" or "necessary" for the development of a child. Whose interests does spanking actually serve?

---

More than information about the effects of spanking children

To empathise opposing viewpoints well-nigh the movement to ban spanking, I recommend two authors.

Murray Straus was perhaps the most eminent researcher to advocate the abolition of spanking. His 2005 chapter, "Children should never, always be spanked no affair what the circumstances," can be downloaded direct from the organization, opens in a new windowSave the Children.

In this newspaper, Straus drives home the points that (i) spanking children may be harmful in means that aren't axiomatic until kids go older, and (2) spanking children isn't especially constructive, and is therefore unnecessary.

Robert Larzelere has published several methodological critiques of anti-spanking research. His focus is on distinguishing between "provisional spanking," and other, more severe forms of corporal penalization.

As noted on his university'southward website, "Dr. Larzelere is concerned about the trend to adopt increasingly extreme anti-spanking bans throughout the globe, bans that accept no sound scientific basis." As all-encompassing listing of his publications tin exist plant on this page; it includes links to several studies and papers nearly spanking children.

---

References: Spanking children

Alyahri A and Goodman R. 2008. Harsh corporal punishment of Yemeni children: occurrence, type and associations. Child Abuse Negl. 32(8):766-73.

Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH, Juffer F. 2003. Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and zipper interventions in early babyhood. Psychol Balderdash. 129(ii):195-215.

Barnes JC, Boutwell BB, Beaver KM, Gibson CL. 2013. Analyzing the Origins of Childhood Externalizing Behavioral Issues. Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar 11. [Epub ahead of print]

Berlin LJ, Ispa JM, Fine MA, Malone PS, Brooks-Gunn J, Brady-Smith C, Ayoub C, and Bai Y. 2009. Correlates and consequences of spanking and verbal punishment for low-income White, African American, and Mexican American toddlers. Child Dev. 80(5):1403-20.

Bugental DB, Martorell GA, and Barraza V. 2003. The hormonal costs of subtle forms of babe maltreatment. Horm Behav. 43(i):237-44.

Chang L, Schwartz D, Dodge K, McBride-Chang C. 2003. Harsh parenting in relation to child emotion regulation and aggression. Journal of Family Psychology. 17:598–606.

Chiocca EM. 2017. American Parents' Attitudes and Beliefs Nearly Corporal Punishment: An Integrative Literature Review. J Pediatr Health Care. 31(three):372-383.

Coley RL, Kull MA, and Carrano J. 2014. Parental endorsement of spanking and children'due south internalizing and externalizing problems in African American and Hispanic families. J Fam Psychol. 28(one):22-31.

Dobbs TA, Smith AB, Taylor NJ. 2006. No, we don't get a say, children merely suffer the consequences": Children talk about family discipline. International Periodical of Children's Rights. 14:137–156.

Elgar FJ, Donnelly PD, Michaelson V, Gariépy G, Riehm KE, Walsh SD, Pickett W. 2018. Corporal punishment bans and physical fighting in adolescents: an ecological study of 88 countries. BMJ Open up. eight(9):e021616.

Ember C and Ember One thousand. 2005. Explaining Corporal Punishment of Children: A Cross-Cultural Study. American Anthropologist 107(4): 609-619.

Ferguson CJ. 2013. Spanking, corporal punishment and negative long-term outcomes: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 33(one):196-208.

Friedson 2016. Authoritarian parenting attitudes and social origin: The multigenerational human relationship of socioeconomic position to childrearing values. Child Abuse Negl. 51:263-75.

Gershoff ET, Sattler KMP, Ansari A. 2018. Strengthening Causal Estimates for Links Betwixt Spanking and Children's Externalizing Beliefs Problems. Psychol Sci. 29(1):110-120.

Gershoff ET. 2017. School corporal penalty in global perspective: prevalence, outcomes, and efforts at intervention. Psychol Health Med. 22(sup1):224-239.

Gershoff ET and Font SA. 2016. Corporal Penalty in U.Southward. Public Schools: Prevalence, Disparities in Use, and Status in Country and Federal Policy. Soc Policy Rep. 30. pii: 1.

Gershoff ET, Lansford JE, Sexton HR, Davis-Kean P, and Sameroff AJ. 2012. Longitudinal links between spanking and children's externalizing behaviors in a national sample of White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian American families. Kid Dev. 83(3):838-43.

Gershoff ET, Grogan-Kaylor A, Lansford JE, Chang L, Zelli A, Deater-Deckard Yard, Dodge KA. 2010. Parent discipline practices in an international sample: associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness. Child Dev. 81(2):487-502.

Global Initiative to Cease All Corporal Penalty. 2019. "Global progress." Web article at https://endcorporalpunishment.org/ Accessed iii/half dozen/2019.

Grogan-Kaylor A. 2005. Relationship of corporal punishment and antisocial beliefs by neighborhood. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 159(10):938-42.

Gunnoe ML. 2013. Associations between parenting style, concrete subject, and adjustment in adolescents' reports. Psychol Rep. 112(3):933-75.

Javo C, Rønning JA, Heyerdahl Due south, and Rudmin FW. 2004. Parenting correlates of child behavior problems in a multiethnic community sample of preschool children in northern Kingdom of norway. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 13(1):8-18.

Johnson JG, Cohen P, Chen H, Kasen Due south, and Brook JS. 2006. Parenting behaviors associated with gamble for offspring personality disorder during machismo. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 63(5):579-87.

Lansford JE, Chang Fifty, Dodge KA, Malone PS, Oburu P, Palmérus M, Bacchini D, Pastorelli C, Bombi Every bit, Zelli A, Tapanya Due south, Chaudhary Due north, Deater-Deckard Yard, Manke B, Quinn Northward. 2005. Physical subject area and children'south adjustment: cultural normativeness as a moderator. Child Dev. 76(6):1234-46.

Lansford JE and Contrivance KA. 2008. Cultural Norms for Adult Corporal Punishment of Children and Societal Rates of Endorsement and Use of Violence. Parent Sci Pract. 1;viii(iii):257-270.

Lansford JE, Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Criss MM, Shaw DS, and Bates JE. 2009. Trajectories of physical discipline: Early childhood antecedents and developmental outcomes. Kid Development 80(5): 1385-1402.

Lansford JE, Wager LB, Bates JE, Pettit GS, and Dodge KA. 2012. Forms of Spanking and Children's Externalizing Behaviors. Fam Relat. 61(2):224-236.

Larzelere RE. 2000. Child outcomes of nonabusive and customary physical penalty by parents: An updated literature review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review three:199–221.

Larzelere RE, Cox RB Jr, Smith GL. 2010. Do nonphysical punishments reduce antisocial behavior more than spanking? a comparing using the strongest previous causal show confronting spanking BMC Pediatr. 2010 x(1):10.

Lee SJ, Grogan-Kaylor A, Berger LM. 2014. Parental spanking of 1-year-old children and subsequent kid protective services interest. Child Corruption Negl. 38(v):875-83.

Maguire-Jack K, Gromoske AN, Berger LM.2012. Spanking and child development during the first 5 years of life. Child Dev. 83(6):1960-77.

MacKenzie MJ, Nicklas East, Brooks-Gunn J, and Waldfogel J. 2015. Spanking and children's externalizing behavior across the get-go decade of life: evidence for transactional processes. J Youth Adolesc. 44(iii):658-69.

MacKenzie MJ, Nicklas E, Waldfogel J, Brooks-Gunn J. 2012. Corporal penalisation and child behavioral and cognitive outcomes through 5 years-of-age: Evidence from a contemporary urban birth cohort study. Infant Child Dev. 21(1):iii-33.

MacKenzie MJ, Nicklas E, Waldfogel J, Brooks-Gunn J. 2013. Spanking and child evolution across the first decade of life. Pediatrics. 132(v):e1118-25.

Merrick MT, Ports KA, Ford DC, Afifi TO, Gershoff ET, Grogan-Kaylor A. 2017. Unpacking the impact of adverse childhood experiences on adult mental wellness. Kid Abuse Negl. 69:10-19.

Mulvaney MK and Mebert CJ. 2007. Parental corporal punishment predicts behavior issues in early on childhood. J Fam Psychol. 21(iii):389-97.

Ogando Portela MJ and Pells 1000. 2015. Corporal punishment in schools: Longitudinal evidence from Ethiopia, Bharat, Peru, and Viet Nam. Innocenti Discussion Paper No. 2015-02, UNICEF Part of Research, Florence.

Okuzono South, Fujiwara T, Kato T, Kawachi I. 2017. Spanking and subsequent behavioral issues in toddlers: A propensity score-matched, prospective written report in Japan. Child Abuse Negl. 69:62-71

O'Leary SG. 1995. Parental subject field mistakes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, four(1): 11-13.

Sege RD, Siegel BS; Council on Kid Abuse and Neglect; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. 2018. Constructive Discipline to Raise Healthy Children. Pediatrics. 142(6).

Simons DA, Wurtele SK. 2010. Relationships betwixt parents' use of corporal punishment and their children's endorsement of spanking and striking other children. Child Abuse Negl.;34(9):639-46

Taylor CA, Manganello JA, Lee SJ, and Rice JC. 2010. Mothers' Spanking of three-Twelvemonth-Old Children and Subsequent Risk of Children'due south Ambitious Behavior. 125(five):e1057-65

Temple JR, Choi HJ, Reuter T, Wolfe D, Taylor CA, Madigan Southward, Scott LE. 2018. Childhood Corporal Punishment and Future Perpetration of Physical Dating Violence. J Pediatr. 194:233-237

Whaley AL. 2000. Sociocultural differences in the developmental consequences of the use of physical subject field during childhood for African Americans. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 6(1):5-12.

Zolotor AJ, Theodore AD, Chang JJ, Berkoff MC, Runyan DK. 2008. Speak softly–and forget the stick. Corporal punishment and child physical corruption. Am J Prev Med. 35(4):364-ix.

Content of "Spanking children: What are the consequences" last modified three/2019

prototype credits for "Spanking children: What are the consequences?"

image of boy sitting in chair with back to viewer past shutterstock / Lopolo

borkholderuposecushers.blogspot.com

Source: https://parentingscience.com/spanking-children/